A column published in Dinamalar argues that a group it labels the “cockroach party” is attempting to undermine India’s democratic process by projecting a protest in Delhi as the voice of the entire country. The writer questions whether people from Tamil Nadu and other states are being sidelined in this narrative.
The article claims that social media influencers have amplified the movement and alleges that its political backers include the Aam Aadmi Party and the Congress. It says the mobilisation initially appeared like satire or a youth platform, but later showed an intent to provoke violence and seek a change of government.
Citing the unrest around the Jantar Mantar protest, the writer alleges that more than 118 police personnel were injured and claims that individuals with serious criminal backgrounds were part of the crowd. The piece further alleges that the group expected a harsh crackdown to trigger wider youth anger against the government, and credits the Union government for responding with restraint while containing violence.
The column raises a series of questions, including why parties allegedly supportive of the group did not condemn violence, why many foreigners—especially Americans—were present, and how the movement obtained “hundreds of crores” in funding. It also questions whether sabotage politics is being preferred over electoral politics.
In its concluding section, the writer urges Tamil Nadu readers to reflect on the risks of repeatedly challenging electoral processes after defeats. It references the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter lists, noting it began in 1960 under Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, and points to differing views within the Congress, including remarks attributed to Kerala leader Ramesh Chennithala about SIR’s usefulness in a recent Kerala election.
